The Campaign for a Better Budget Process
Process does matter
Minnesota's elected officials are charged with the essential duty
of managing the state's finances, making critical decisions about
how to balance revenues and expenditures to ensure a successful
future for the state. Although attention is usually focused on the
ultimate outcomes of a legislative session, we should not forget
the decision-making process that lies beneath. A good process ensures
a well-informed debate which includes ample public participation.
The Minnesota Budget Project is advocating for a Better Budget
Process in Minnesota. Based on five principles to guide us to a
better process, the Minnesota Budget Project recommends that the
state's economic forecasts take inflation into account and that
the state incrementally build the size of the state's budget reserves
to a responsible level.
Five Principles for a Better Budget
Process
Ensure the State's Economic
Forecasts Take Inflation into Account
Build the State's Budget Reserves to
a Responsible Level
Testimony on Senate budget process reform bills, April 2008
Legislative Updates
Budget Reforms in the 2007 Legislative Session: Progress
Lost to a Veto
The 2007 Legislative Session saw progress on several key principles
of a Better Budget Process, including taking inflation into account
in the state's economic forecasts and adding to the state's budget
reserves. Unfortunately, the Governor vetoed the omnibus tax bill
that contained these important provisions. However, the increased
level of support and public interest in these issues indicate that
the debate will continue. The Minnesota Budget Project has issued
an analysis of budget reforms
proposed in the 2007 Legislative Session
Ensuring the State's Economic Forecasts Take Inflation
into Account
On January 26, the Minnesota Senate passed
Senate File 25, which would overturn the 2002 law that forbids
the inclusion of the impact of inflation on spending in the state's
fiscal forecast. SF 25 is consistent with the Minnesota Budget Project's
recommendations for a better budget process. The bill is still awaiting
action in the House.
On February 28, several prominent public finance experts released
a statement supporting the goal
of restoring the impact of inflation on spending in the state's
financial forecasts.
A provision to restore a measure of inflation in the forecast was
included in HF
2268, the omnibus tax bill passed by the Legislature. On May
31, 2007, the Governor vetoed this legislation. The Minnesota Budget
Project expressed our disappointment with this blow to fiscal responsibility.
Building the State's Budget Reserves
When Governor Pawlenty released his proposed budget, he took a
good first step in increasing the budget reserve. The initial budget
proposal added $47 million to the reserve in FY 2008, and would
build the reserves over time by allocating a portion of future surpluses
to the reserve until it reaches 5% of annual spending. In his Supplemental
Budget, Governor Pawlenty proposes increasing the budget reserve
by $147 million in FY 2008, and continues to set 5% of annual spending
as the goal. The Minnesota Budget Project applauds the Governor's
efforts to increase the budget reserves, but we continue to urge
a higher long-term goal. The state's Council of Economic Advisors
suggests that 5% of biennial spending might be a more prudent target.
On March 28, the Senate passed
SF 2054, which sends an additional $629 million to the budget
reserve.
The House increases the budget reserve by $30 million in their
omnibus
tax bill (HF 2362).
The Legislature included a $150 million increase in the budget
reserve in the omnibus tax bill (HF
2268), which was vetoed by the Governor. As a result, the budget
reserve will remain at existing levels.
Budget Process Issues in the Media
Below are links to media coverage of budget process issues.
A
Star Tribune editorial argues that
the Governor should not veto the omnibus tax bill, which includes
the impact of inflation in the state's forecasts (May 30, 2007)
St. Louis County Commissioner Steve O'Neil
argues for a return to "honest budgeting" by including the impact
of inflation in the state's forecasts (May 4, 2007)
A St. Paul Pioneer Press Letter to the Editor
by the Minnesota Budget Project's Christina Macklin clarifies the
difference between the forecast and budget decisions (February 26,
2007)
Minnesota
Daily editorial in favor of including inflation in the Forecast
(January 25, 2007)
Star
Tribune editorial in favor of including inflation in the Forecast
(January 24, 2007)
Former
Finance Commissioner Jay Kiedrowski
discusses the importance of budget process changes, including building
the state's reserves (January 7, 2007)
Updated April 16, 2008 |